Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Hardware/Software Conundrum - What should I do next?  (Read 488 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
phil1066
NZ
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +9/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 419


Living in Gods Own Country

p1_m3@hotmail.co.uk
Email
« on: 01 January 2009, 06:08:58 AM »

Okay, so my current setup includes:

- Nikon D40x (new)
- 18-55mm F3.5-F4.5 VR Lens (new)
- 55-200mm F4-F5.6 VR Lens (new)
- Manfrotto Tripods x2 (light and heavy)
- Monopod
- Remote release
- Assorted filters
- Adobe Lightroom 1.4
- Adobe Photoshop CS2

Assuming, and this is not necessarily the case, that more finances were available, what are the next logical steps in terms of hardware or software. Would money be better spent on software upgrades or should I be looking at better lenses, or even a better camera?

Any views and advice welcome  Smiley
Logged

JamesC
Guest
« Reply #1 on: 01 January 2009, 10:44:13 AM »

I'd go for a camera/lens upgrade. Software is fine but you need the raw materials to work with and you want the biggest, cleanest files possible. I'm using Photoshop Elements 6 and Canons DPP software and honestly don't need anything else. Get yourself a D700 and zoom - or you could defect to Canon Tongue.
Logged
Pete W
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +14/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 369


Only me

peteruk300@live.co.uk
WWW
« Reply #2 on: 01 January 2009, 11:40:03 AM »

Phil
I would look at increasing your lens collection. Lenses usually last longer than bodies and a good quality lens can make all the difference. Then when you eventually upgrade your body you will already have the lenses in place to compliment it Smiley


I would not worry to much about software at this stage. You have CS2 and Lightroom 1.4 which if they support your body are good bits of software.
Logged

NIGDAW
Full Member
***

Karma: +9/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 150


NIGDAW PHOTOGRAPHY


« Reply #3 on: 01 January 2009, 12:25:07 PM »

Hi, as someone with limited funds myself, I would suggest you look at Sigma lenses. I have a 10-20 zoom which has great write ups and cost a fraction of other manufacturers, as well as a 70-300 which also has great performance. My next lens is going to be their 120-400 which you can use a 2X converter with. I've got the same camera as you and am pleased with the results.
Regards Nigel
Logged

phil1066
NZ
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +9/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 419


Living in Gods Own Country

p1_m3@hotmail.co.uk
Email
« Reply #4 on: 02 January 2009, 09:35:49 AM »

thanks all - lots of different views there.

im not in any hurry so lets see what happens, but any way I better start saving eh? Shocked

cos stuff isnt cheap aye.
Logged

hardingbr
Full Member
***

Karma: +5/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 147

hardingbr@hotmail.com
Email
« Reply #5 on: 03 January 2009, 06:44:05 PM »

Hi Phil,
Personally, I am saving up for a full frame camera that will give me less noise and better low-light performance.  Have you tried any prime lenses?
Logged
phil1066
NZ
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +9/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 419


Living in Gods Own Country

p1_m3@hotmail.co.uk
Email
« Reply #6 on: 04 January 2009, 02:36:21 AM »

Hi Brian - yes a full frame would be nice. Havent tried any prime lenses yet. Some Ive seen are as much as or more than a new decent camera body - so there lies the conundrum again.

I may look at Sigma prime lenses due to their lower cost  Wink
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: