Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Storage / Archiving of images  (Read 303 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
phil1066
NZ
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +9/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 419


Living in Gods Own Country

p1_m3@hotmail.co.uk
Email
« on: 12 September 2008, 11:41:56 PM »

Hi all - just wanted to get a sense of 'best practice' in terms of storing images. Yes, memory is cheap these days, but given the increase files sizes and sheer numbers of images taken what is the best approach? A few questions:

1. Culling - if you take 200 photos on a shoot, do you check through them on the Pc, deleting the crap ones, or do you keep them all?
2. Storing - of the photos you do keep do you keep them all in full (original) size, or do you downsize some of them?
3. Archiving - do you keep everything on hard-drive (includes portable media) or burn to CD, if you know you wont be looking at them or needing them for a while, or to save space?

Thanks for any tips
Logged

JamesC
Guest
« Reply #1 on: 13 September 2008, 07:37:16 AM »

Hi Phil, I don't know about best practice but I have all the shots on my pc duplicated on an external hard drive. These are relatively cheap given their storage capacity. Maybe shots of special one off events I will burn to cd as well. I shoot raw files when out and about and sift through these on the pc at home. Some duds will stand out immediately and go in the bin. The best ones I save as 16bit Tiffs and work from there. Once the white balance/contrast etc is adjusted in the raw converter there isn't any real need to go back to the raws again unless shooting for HDR but thats another story!
I tend not to shoot a lot of images anyway and dislike similars so my workload is smaller to begin with Smiley.
Logged
phil1066
NZ
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +9/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 419


Living in Gods Own Country

p1_m3@hotmail.co.uk
Email
« Reply #2 on: 13 September 2008, 10:02:17 PM »

Thanks James - why do you work with TIFFs (I'm assuming saved from LightRoom or something) and not JPEGs - probably a noob question  Cheesy
Logged

JamesC
Guest
« Reply #3 on: 13 September 2008, 10:29:37 PM »

Jpegs are a compressed file type - a bit like MP3, so there is some data loss when the file is saved. Tiffs are not saved the same way - there is no loss involved. Having said that if you save a jpeg at level 10 or above in Photoshop or other software the loss is hardly noticeable. If you're storing a lot of files and do a bit of compression at high quality settings then jpegs are fine - they take up a lot less space. I'm just fussy thats all. Smiley
« Last Edit: 13 September 2008, 10:35:21 PM by JamesC » Logged
mxbuck
Full Member
***

Karma: +9/-1
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 187



WWW
« Reply #4 on: 14 September 2008, 08:15:16 PM »

Jpegs are a compressed file type - a bit like MP3, so there is some data loss when the file is saved. Tiffs are not saved the same way - there is no loss involved. Having said that if you save a jpeg at level 10 or above in Photoshop or other software the loss is hardly noticeable. If you're storing a lot of files and do a bit of compression at high quality settings then jpegs are fine - they take up a lot less space. I'm just fussy thats all. Smiley

...and while Jpegs are known for their space compression , they also compress colours too. I generally save a high quality printable version as a TIFF because it is "loss-less". Not only is spatial detail preserved down to the last pixel, but colour fidelity is also preserved. Jpeg (with anything less than level 10) will wash out or obliterate colour detail at the pixel level. That's another reason for setting the level to 12 always unless you need to save storage.

 That's why I was a bit surprised that the site requirement was for Jpegs rather than Tiffs.


...Max
Logged

phil1066
NZ
Global Moderator
Sr. Member
*****

Karma: +9/-0
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 419


Living in Gods Own Country

p1_m3@hotmail.co.uk
Email
« Reply #5 on: 15 September 2008, 11:55:01 AM »

Yep - ive been sticking to 'Level 12' in Photoshop lately anyway - thanks for the advice guys.
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to: